OK let's go one by one and explain how each practice listed below overrides or bypasses natural biological timing and processes, and introduces risks that far outweigh any benefit:


1. Genetic Screening is routinely offered in both pregnancy and after birth, despite the fact that it often produces high false positives, rarely offers actionable solutions, and frequently causes unnecessary stress, invasive testing, or even termination - despite the fact that most of the “conditions” detected either don’t develop or have no effective treatment anyway.

Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions - PMC
As prenatal genetic testing technologies have become both easier and more accessible, women are increasingly choosing prenatal genetic testing for a reason that is largely unexamined in the clinical literature: preparation. This reasoning, offered…

2. Routine Ultrasounds are heavily overused in low-risk pregnancies, often leading to false diagnoses and unnecessary interventions like induction or cesarean, despite the fact that there's no solid evidence they improve outcomes and some evidence suggests excessive exposure may disrupt fetal brain development due to the heat and vibration they produce.

Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures.
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the effectiveness of routine ultrasound scanning in pregnancy by a meta-analysis of various outcome measures. DESIGN--Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluating the effect of routine ultrasound scanning on perinatal mortality and morbidity. Live birth rate (that is, live births per pregnancy) is included as a measure of pregnancy outcome in addition to the conventional perinatal mortality. SUBJECTS--15,935 pregnancies (7992 in which routine ultrasound scanning was used and 7943 controls with selective scanning) from four randomised controlled trials. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Perinatal mortality, live birth rate, rate of miscarriage, Apgar score < 7 at 1 minute, and number of induced labours. RESULTS--The live birth rate was identical in both screening and control groups (odds ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.12) although the perinatal mortality was significantly lower in the group who had routine ultrasonography (0.64, 0.43 to 0.97). Differences in perinatal morbidity between the two groups as measured by the proportion of newborn babies with Apgar score < 7 at 1 minute were not significant (1.05; 0.93 to 1.19). CONCLUSION--Routine ultrasound scanning does not improve the outcome of pregnancy in terms of an increased number of live births or of reduced perinatal morbidity. Routine ultrasound scanning may be effective and useful as a screening for malformation. Its use for this purpose, however, should be made explicit and take into account the risk of false positive diagnosis in addition to ethical issues.

3. Induced Labor using Pitocin or artificial rupture of membranes forces the body into labor before it's hormonally or energetically ready, which leads to unnaturally strong contractions, less oxygen for the baby, increased fetal distress, and a much higher chance of needing a C-section.

Prospective cohort study of induction of labor: Indications, outcome and postpartum hemorrhage - PMC
This study was undertaken because of the increasing rate of induction of labor (IOL) in our hospital and its associated higher caesarean section (CS) rates. The objective was to ascertain the incidence, indications, methods, outcome, and…

4. Epidurals are marketed as harmless pain relief, but they often slow labor, increase the need for synthetic hormones to keep things moving, raise the risk of fever and infection, and interfere with bonding and early breastfeeding - while also disconnecting the mother from the embodied experience of birth.

The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review - PubMed
Mothers given an epidural rather than parenteral opioid labor analgesia report less pain and are more satisfied with their pain relief. Analgesic method does not affect fetal oxygenation, neonatal pH, or 5-minute Apgar scores; however, neonates whose mothers received parenteral opioids require nalox …

5. Cesarean Section, are vastly overperformed and come with a long list of long-term consequences including infant respiratory issues, disrupted microbiome development, higher risks of chronic disease, and increased complications in future pregnancies - all for a birth method that bypasses the entire natural activation sequence of vaginal birth.

Health Implications of Increased Cesarean Section Rates - PMC
The health implications of Caesarean section are a significant factor in evaluating the use of Caesarean section as a method of completing childbirth. The increased rate of Cesarean section augmenting in a statistical way the health implications of…

6. Immediate Cord Clamping is still the norm in many hospitals even though it deprives the baby of up to 40% of their total blood volume, cuts off a critical transfer of stem cells and iron, and increases the risk of anemia and developmental delays, all to save a few minutes of convenience. 

Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late-onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial - PubMed
Delayed cord clamping seems to protect VLBW infants from IVH and LOS, especially for male infants.

7. Routine Suctioning of the baby’s nose and mouth is an outdated practice that can cause physical trauma and unnecessary stress, even though babies are designed to clear fluid naturally through the birth canal and their first few breaths, and the WHO has made it clear it shouldn’t be done unless absolutely necessary.

Does Medical Evidence Support Routine Oronasopharyngeal Suction at Delivery? - PMC
Oronasopharyngeal suction (ONPS) is regularly performed in neonates at delivery in many hospitals across the country today. Although ONPS is a technique that has essentially become habitual for most obstetricians, its theorized usefulness to help…

8. Immediate Newborn Assessment often involves taking the baby away within minutes of birth for weighing, injections, and cleaning, even though that early separation disrupts oxytocin release, interferes with bonding and breastfeeding, stresses the baby’s nervous system, and could easily be delayed without harm.

Healthy Birth Practice #6: Keep Mother and Baby Together- It’s Best for Mother, Baby, and Breastfeeding - PubMed
Mothers and babies have a physiologic need to be together at the moment of birth and during the hours and days that follow. Keeping mothers and babies together is a safe and healthy birth practice. Evidence supports immediate, uninterrupted skin-to-skin care after vaginal birth and during and after …

9. Erythromycin Eye Ointment is used despite being an extremely outdated blanket treatment for an extremely rare issue - it’s supposed to prevent blindness from gonorrhea, but unless the baby was born vaginally to a mother with active gonorrhea, it does nothing but blur the baby’s vision and interfere with bonding and latching during the most important hour of life.

Neonatal ocular prophylaxis in the United States: is it still necessary? - PubMed
Administration of erythromycin ophthalmic ointment for the prevention of neonatal conjunctivitis is not literature-supported. Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women is the most effective way to prevent ophthalmia neonatorum. National mandates for prophylaxis should be withdrawn.

10. Early Newborn Bathing strips the baby of their protective vernix, disrupts temperature regulation, and washes away their initial skin microbiome - all for a hospital photo op, when waiting just 24 to 48 hours would allow for better immune protection, skin health, and energetic adjustment to the outside world.

Effect of less frequent bathing of preterm infants on skin flora and pathogen colonization - PubMed
Findings from this study suggest that the frequency of bathing of preterm infants can be reduced without increasing the risk of infection.

11. The Hepatitis B Vaccine is injected into all newborns regardless of their actual risk, even though transmission is virtually impossible from a Hep B-negative mother, and the vaccine contains aluminum adjuvants and DNA technology that have never been studied long-term in infants.

Hepatitis B Vaccine and Multiple Sclerosis: Cause or Coincidence - PMC
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease in which the body’s immune system destroys myelin causing disruption of signals from the brain to the rest of the body. MS can be triggered by a variety of reasons. In this study, we present the case…

12. Vitamin K Injections are given at a dose nearly 100x greater than what naturally occurs and contains preservatives like benzyl alcohol and polysorbate 80. Considering Vitamin K is produced by the microbiota of the gut and is not bio available or beneficial to muscles cells, there's absolutely no reason this shouldn't be taken orally.

Childhood cancer, intramuscular vitamin K, and pethidine given during labour - PubMed
The only two studies so far to have examined the relation between childhood cancer and intramuscular vitamin K have shown similar results, and the relation is biologically plausible. The prophylactic benefits against haemorrhagic disease are unlikely to exceed the potential adverse effects from intr …

13. Delayed Breastfeeding and Formula Supplementation sabotage one of the most important moments in a newborn’s life by disrupting latching, gut microbiome development, and maternal milk production, despite the fact that breastfeeding in the first hour is key for immunity, regulation, and long-term success.

First Do No Harm: Interventions During Childbirth - PMC
Although medical and technological advances in maternity care have drastically reduced maternal and infant mortality, these interventions have become commonplace if not routine. Used appropriately, they can be life-saving procedures. Routine use,…
  1. Fetal monitoring during labor might seem like an absolute necessity to ensure newborn safety, but one study of 70,000 pregnancies found no difference in outcome between monitored and unmonitored patients, and other studies have shown that monitoring results in an increase in infant mortality among the patients monitored. This suggests that, at best, monitoring does no good, and at worst it may do harm.
Fetal heart rate monitoring during labour--too frequent intervention, too little benefit? - PubMed
For many obstetricians and midwives continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring during labour has replaced the traditional method of intermittent auscultation. Of the eight prospective randomised controlled trials designed to assess its value in obstetric care, four were concerned with mothers …