Our country has spent $2 trillion on genetic “therapy.” That’s double what’s been spent on cancer research, ten times more than on neurodegenerative disease, and eighty times more than on nutrition and disease prevention.
And yet, after $2 trillion, 40 years of research and thousands of trials - not a single cure or scalable, safe treatment has emerged.
(To put the cost in perspective: that’s a million dollars a day for 5,500 years... with nothing to show for it.)
Oh gee gang, what a mystery. Definitely not because humans are completely different from monkeys and their cells don't contain the same kind of conscious intelligence as ours. That would never matter! The chemicals are all the same!
Why? Because there's no such thing as a universal genetic trigger for any chronic illness. Not one. Every so-called “monogenic disorder” collapses under scrutiny.
Genetic variation is the rule, not the exception. The uniqueness of your genetic code is not an error, it's your body’s signature. Editing the genome to treat illness is like blaming a smoke detector for a fire. Genes don’t cause disease any more than alarms cause fires.
This tells you everything you need to know about the motives of these scientists - it was not to heal anyone.
For some reason this entire field of research has failed to recognize that every single cell in the body contains identical DNA that allows them to exist like nodes connected to a shared wifi network. In order to "correct" a genetic error, the error would need to be corrected all 40 trillion cells.
Each cell is literally a fractal of the whole which it came from. The code contained in the first single before it divided into form. To think that we can genetically alter the DNA of some cells and not produce decoherence from the system is insane.
And this one just about sums up every modern scientists approach to experimental medicine.
The idea that genes can and should be 'corrected' assumes three things: (1) that there’s a singular correct version of every gene, (2) what this 'correct' version will behave identically in all unique genetic codes, and (3) that the body’s won’t override or reject the edit but welcome it as an improvement.
These assumptions are wildly unscientific and yet somehow they underpin a 2 trillion dollar research program.
There is no fixed reference genome for human health to reference and compare another to:
“The reference sequence is not a finished product… substantial variation between individuals is the rule, not the exception.” International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium (Nature, 2004)
“We now understand that there is no single, definitive ‘human genome’. The diversity of genomes across populations has rendered the concept of a universal reference increasingly obsolete.” Green et al., “Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside” (Nature, 2011)
“The existing reference genome (GRCh38) fails to capture population-specific structural variants... A true understanding of human health requires population-wide genomic diversity to be accounted for.” The Human Pangenome Project: A new genomic foundation for human biology and health (Nature 2023)
And still, despite absolutely no logical justification, scientists continue to pour money into new tactics to manipulate and deceive the body into obeying man's will.
One of the earliest gene therapy subjects, Jesse Gelsinger, died during a trial, yet research accelerated instead of pausing for reflection. Instead of saying, "Hey, maybe the body is telling us that its DNA is not up for debate", our scientists said "We must produce a powerful cloaking mechanism to deliver the new genetic code into the cell (so that we can be heroes and save the genetically inferior people from themselves)."
At this point it's obvious that there is very little true interest in healing the body, they just want to assert their will over it.
Scientists are now trying their hand at germline editing (inheritable changes) to see if they have any luck there (despite never having luck anywhere else). The risks in this are potentially catastrophic. There's absolutely no way for any scientist to justify doing this in the name of health or healing.
Single-gene diseases, so-called ‘monogenic’ disorders, have never once been proven to exist. No gene or "genetic code mutation" has ever reliably produced the same disease in everyone who carries it - in most it doesn't produce disease at all.
CFTR mutations appear in individuals who never develop cystic fibrosis. BRCA mutation carriers never develop cancer. Huntington’s presents with wild variability even in confirmed carriers.
Penetrance, the term for how often a gene actually results in disease, has never reached 100%. Not even close. Genes have never been shown to deterministically predict or cause a disease, so this hyper fixation on removing or editing genes simply can't by explained by a drive to “cure” anything.
“The same genotype can produce vastly different phenotypes depending on early-life experience, maternal care, and environmental input. Epigenetic mechanisms mediate this plasticity.” (“Epigenetics and Developmental Plasticity”, Frances Champagne, Annual Review of Psychology, 2010)
“Gene expression is not determined solely by DNA sequence, but by a dynamic network of epigenetic marks, environmental inputs, and feedback loops.” (Beyond the gene: epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of gene expression, Bioessays, 2009)
“The reference genome is a mosaic from multiple anonymous donors, and is not representative of any single individual.”
The Human Genome Project was a $3 billion effort intended to map a complete “reference” of the human genetic code. While it claimed “completion,” what was completed was a composite from a handful of individuals, not a universal or consistent reference. It itself wasn't even a coherent natural DNA code, but a man made compilation.
Disease isn’t stored in the DNA. It emerges from dysfunctional environments, imbalances in mitochondrial signaling, heavy metal accumulation, petrochemical residues, EMF saturation, and the breakdown of electrical coherence within tissues.
Not to mention that one the synthetic code is contained within your cells, via CRISPR, mRNA, or viral vectors, it's still the legal property of its owner - which is not you, but by the corporations that made patented it. U.S. patent law protects synthetic sequences. Moderna and Pfizer have filed for and received patents on engineered mRNA. Insert it into your cells, and your body now expresses intellectual property you do not own.
Every single human's genetic code is slightly different in ways that are determined by multiple factors. Research has continuously reported that there are epigenetic factors that more consistently describe or explain DNA than being a static code that carries the fate of your health.
For 30 years researchers have been saying that gene expression is fluid, not fixed. The DNA reflects the environment it was shaped in, not some static code represented by an arbitrary man-made 4 letter code. Disease is adaptive compensation, not defective programming.
But the epigenesists refuse to acknowledge how this completely obliterates the whole foundation of their research model.
We've spent over two trillion dollars obsessing over finding a way to successfully manipulate the very code that sustains our consciousness. Genetic research is so thoroughly discredited by its own research and continuous failure to prove benefit and reduce risk that the continued hyper fixation and extreme investment can only be explained as something far more devious hiding behind manipulative language and being sustained and reinforced through narrative network control.
If you familiarize yourself with the research, the goals of the researchers, and language used and the general attitudes and writing styles of the individuals doing this work - you'll begin to recognize a continuous repetition of illogical logic - and a very specific narrative that uses language to say a lot while actually saying nothing of scientific or medical value.
I don't believe there is anyway that scientists well versed in the data could ever say that this has proven itself a worthy and valid field of research. In fact, there is absolutely no evidence to support its priority in funding, no evidence proving it is capable of producing a benefit in all or even majority of human test subjects, and extremely consistent risks with death not being uncommon during trials.
Quite frankly, when a cost benefit analysis is used and duration of studies is considered, there's literally no other way to justify the continuation and expansion of this research without being suspicious of deeper ideological motives.
How on earth have we allowed our government to pour infinite resources into conducting continuous of failed studies? Can scientists not accept when there isn't a way to manipulate certain things in the body? Why do they believe they are capable of restructuring our most fundamental energy imprint, the fractal code contained and connecting every single cell in the body.
What in God's name ever game them the idea that destroying that or replacing it with man-made synthetic code - could ever benefit or improve life? How much evidence of harm needs to be produced before they give up and admit this field crosses a line - the mechanisms go against the laws of nature. The first 20 years of research continuously found that there way no way to get the payload into the intracellular space efficiently, and "code" eventually was always removed from the cell.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570963914002222
Discussion