Science is less about truth, and more about models.
Most of modern science, and ALL of modern biology, chemistry, and pharmacology, relies on linear, scalar models to describe 3D phenomena. We reduce molecules to single values like molecular weight or pH. We assume one cause always produces the same effect - one chemical always results in the same chemical reaction.
But molecules are actually electromagnetic energy/potentual trapped in an electromagnetic field of its making. These force fields repel, attract, interact and react depending upon the pattern of energy they contain.
Is some, the flow of the energy is consistent. It's making the same path, at the same speed - in fact its so consistent that it's energy is actually is visible. And the consistency gives the appearance of of a solid form.
The factors determining their behavior are not chemical. The resonance, geometry, spin, polarity, symmetry and environment all determine the spin of these force fields, and some are much more reactive than others. And some cannot be moved or effect by others at all.
The real (blue) and measured (red) parts of a wavefunction tell us where an object is likely to be.
Imagine a cat sitting on ledge. Now, we can use Newtonian physics to help us understand the cats trajectory after he jumps, how far he might go, where he might land- but that tells us absolutely nothing about why the cat will jump, or where and in what direction. The actual cause or reason that the jump itself happened is not understood, or even considered, through any physical measurement.
That's because all of our measurement systems were based upon non-living material. We measured how matter responded when acted upon, not how living matter acted. We've applied laws that only apply to inert, unintelligent matter to dynamic, responsive, intelligent life.
Once scientist realized this, that our current framework was not accounting for a significant amount of factors, there should've been a reckoning.
Everything we know about the human body has been entirely based on the assumption that every single particle is a static energy container, and all particles that look the same act the same.
We've assumed that the shape of the energy container always told you what the energy inside was - which could be quantified by a single value or measurement.
Scientists decided to say that the human body was t0o "wet and warm" (??) for quantum physics to apply to it. The dismissive arrogance of that excuse - the fact no one challenged that claim, the fact that it was just accepted...
And so, we've continued to build upon a framework we've known was fundamentally flawed and incomplete. Rockefeller funded the study that shut down over half of Americas hospitals, took control over the medical education process, and dictated biological science and medicine in strictly newtonian terms. Everything else was shunned and shut down as non-scientific.
We've been slowly redefining our entire 3D energetic reality into static 1D measurements. It's no wonder all of science and medicine has felt like we keep moving towards less and less certain terms about the way our realty functions. We've deconstructed everything we'd learned over thousands of years, and redefined it in binary terms. Seeing pockets of energy not as potential, but as unchanging solids.
Synthetic materials and pharmacutical substances assume static, uniform behavior of molecules across all tissues and environments.
Imagine thinking you could support or restore life by adding death. And by death, I mean literally non-living molecules (dead matter) mixed together in unnatural ways.
But cells have inherent intelligence and autonomy - they act according to their surroundings. Cells and tissues operate in energetic gradients, including membrane potentials and bioelectric fields. Atomic environments are never truly uniform, meaning they will never act predictably within the complex, asymmetric field gradients of real tissues.
Medical science and the pharmaceutical industry ignore these fields entirely, instead attempting to force a single absolute label and solution onto a dynamic energy system. But you can't treat entropy, decoherence and dysfunction with a lab made synthetic substance designed only for static chemical interference.
A single drug behaves differently depending upon the dosage amount, the different tissues its introduced to, and the other molecules present in the cellular environment at the time its introduced. It is literally impossible that these conditions would be the same in one human body across time – and it's insane to claim that it would always act identically and consistently across all human beings.
The idea that “one molecule = one effect” is completely incompatible with how life works. In reality, resonance and coherence are more fundamental than chemistry.
Pharmaceuticals attempt to block, inhibit or stimulate reactions and responses in the body, but healing is a process of restoring harmonic balance and energy coherence - not producing a reactive, unnatural chemical response. When we try to use chemicals to shortcut the healing process, what we're actually doing is just introducing even more decoherence.
Imagine trying to fix your bluetooth connection by giving your phone some chemicals - you're approaching a problem from an entirely wrong dimension. The problem isn't chemical, its connection.
Imagine I give you a list of 15 people and tell you to choose 3 to build a house with.
Now you have two options: I can give you another list of the genetic code and the molecular make up of each individual.
Or you can spend an hour interacting with with all 15 people, experiencing their energy and deducing their potential through only quantum characteristics, but having absolutely no idea what their DNA, mass or molecular composition TRULY is.
Behavior, personality, mood, life experience - these are all quantum characteristics. They can't be account for through physical measurement.
It would be insane to entirely disregard the existence of these factors and their significance when it comes to understanding each other, but this is exactly what newtonian science does, and why quantum science had to be created in the first place.
As it turns out, all particles have energetic characteristics that can't be accounted for by mass alone. We realized that just being something appeared to be the same externally, it wasn't always the same internally.
Another great way to grasp the value and importance of quantum science is by considering the concept of clones.
Imagine when you're born, I steal your DNA and clone your body. Now while you grow up, being shaped by your interactions, your environment, your consciousness' experience of the world, your clone grows up locked in a room somewhere.
Now, my evil plan is to kidnap you and replace you with your clone. This clone literally is built using the exact same blueprint as you - your share identical DNA. In terms of mass and molecular make up, you and this clone are identical.
So surely, no one will notice when I make the switcheroo, right?
Of course not - your family and friends would immediately realize the person they were interacting with was not you. The physical form might be the same, but the energetic signature is not even close to similar. This person doesn't know how to interact with your mom, only you know how to do that after being shaped by existence with her.
That is what the study of quantum physics is - the study of invisible characteristics, like personality, that completely destroy our ability to predict behavior based off appearance alone.
Particles, biology, consciousness and life itself operate based on multipolar, resonant and field-based principles. Just because you can create a molecule in the same shape as life does, does not mean you can produce its effects.
We've been taught that we are dynamic beings made up of static, unchanging blocks of matter, but every dimension of energy is just as dynamic as our reality.
This is why we can't seem to explain the observer effect - it seems so mysterious to us that a static molecule would ever "act" differently depending upon who is perceiving it. But the truth is, there is no such thing as static anything.
There is literally nothing in our physical world that we could assign a single value to that would mean anything in reality.
This slow drive pushing us to collapse everything into a one-dimensional values isn't just happening in science or biology. It’s happening everywhere, across every aspect of society.
Day by day, we’re being pushed, trained and conditioned to interpret reality through entirely binary filters. We're being conditioned to reduce multidimensional truth into polarized slogans:
left or right
pro-Israel or pro-Palestine
pro-life or pro-choice
pro-science or anti-science
pro-vax or anti-vax
pro-Trump or pro-Elon
We've been convinced that these binary labels are important, but in reality they mean absolutely nothing. None of these categories can describe the infinite complexity, nuance and contextual coherence that actual human personalities contain.
But language is being intentionally shaped to remove nuance and enforce false clarity. The more we collapse complexity into "sides," the easier it is to manage populations, manipulate emotions and dissolve shared meaning.
Language is being intentionally shaped to remove nuance and enforce false clarity. The more we collapse complexity into "sides," the easier it is to manage populations, manipulate emotions and dissolve shared meaning.
Cellular GIF Library
Discussion