When the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 was passed, it removed pharmaceutical companies' liability for vaccine injuries, and shifted the burden of proof from the pharmaceutical companies to the parents of injured children.
This act literally established special one of its kind vaccine court, where injuries would be judged not by traditional legal standards, but by "compensation program" standards. Everything was formulaic. Every child's life had a predetermined price.
Usually in a court of law presumption of innocence only applies to people accused of crime, not to products or actions causing injury. In tort law (personal injury law), strict liability applies to dangerous products, meaning if you manufactured something inherently dangerous, you are responsible for the harm it causes, whether you intended it or not.
But this act armed vaccines with an automatic presumption of safety. So the victims were burdened with proving, with absolute, 100% certainty, that the vaccine caused harm - which is basically an impossible burden of proof, even in the most straight forward cases.
It shouldn't need to be said that this is absolute ass backwards in terms of how true, ethical science should operate.
In all normal law, if you inject a human with something and harm follows, the default assumption is that the injection caused it, unless proven otherwise.
IF you perform an invasive, unnatural act on a body, especially one that violates biological structure, interferes with a cells environments and functions, and disrupts electromagnetic communication in cells and systems, THEN the burden of proof is on YOU to prove that your vaccine, which was forcibly injected into my child, did NOT cause my child any harm.
Why? Because by basic biological law. The skin, mucosa, and electromagnetic energy systems are critical protective layers and bypassing these layers with injected adjuvants, foreign DNA, and neurotoxic metals automatically introduces energetic and structural disruption. This is predictable harm, not hypothetical.
The logical assumption must be that any subsequent chronic illness, autoimmune reaction, neurodevelopmental regression, or death was caused by the violation... unless proven otherwise with absolute certainty.
But thanks to the Vaccine Injury Act, the vaccine injured families now have to prove with total certainty that the vaccine caused the harm. Basically, they have to disprove a negative.
Meanwhile, pharmaceutical companies are never required to prove their product didn’t cause it.... they are totally shielded legally thanks to our government. This impossible by design structure really makes you wonder who the hell came up with this and how did the American people agree to pay the legal bills for the pharmaceutical industries carelessness.
Every single body is unique in its composition - not only genetically, but the gut microbiome, the cell memory, cell health and stability... This means that every adverse response can present a little differently depending on how the body responds.
We were eager to assume (with no evidence) that vaccine harm could only occur during or immediately after vaccination. But we now know that harm can occur over weeks, months, or years.
We're continuously reminded that "Correlation isn't causation", even when the harm follows immediately after injection, even when the mechanism of injury (e.g., aluminum crossing the blood-brain barrier) is already known and there are no other possible causes of death. Even then, we still refuse to dignify these deaths with the truth. Instead we claim to be clueless of the cause.
But the truth is, this act was not signed into place to protect the citizens of America. From its conception, it ensured that no parent, no lawyer, no scientist could ever claim with certainty that vaccines cause ____. And when it did, those were just extremely rare outliers. Kids with weak immune systems to begin with.
This system was built to protect profit, not to protect the truth or ensure justice.
You cant inject metals, viral debris, and adjuvants directly into tissue and assume safety, you have to assume potential for profound disruption, corruption or harm. So it should be the vaccine producers job to prove with absolute certainty that absolutely no long-term electromagnetic, cellular, or neurological harm occurred from the vaccine.
But that would be impossible. They would go broke on paying out claims. Vaccine makers could never, and will never, be able to prove vaccines are harmless. Which means vaccination should never have been mass-mandated to begin with.
When you inject unnatural, disruptive material past the body’s electromagnetic and biological barriers, you commit an act of biological aggression.
The burden is never on the victim to prove harm. The burden is forever on the aggressor to prove no harm was possible.
Vaccines, by their very mechanism, inherently violate biological structure and coherence. They must be assumed guilty until proven innocent... and they can never be proven innocent, because first principles already predict their disruption.
The biggest slap in the face is that even when a family wins their case - there isn't actually any justice. The vaccine manufacturer is 100% protected, and the pay out is paid for by ... you guessed it... our tax dollars. Not the billions of dollars of profit.
So how the hell did this get passed?
Well in the 70s and 80s, vaccine injury lawsuits were BLOWING UP, especially for the DPT vaccine. Pharmaceutical makers were losing a ton of profit paying off families, and the loss would not be sustainable in the long term. They threatened to stop producing vaccines since it would no longer be profitable for them... unless our government gave them some protections.
Vaccines are treated unlike any other product. They're more protected than nuclear plants, airplanes, explosives, or pharmaceuticals.
It is a unique legal protection system, built entirely to preserve corporate profits, not human rights or health. This system was engineered to ensure that overwhelming evidence of harm could be continuously dismissed.
Discussion